In a tale of politics and ignorance Suffolk legislators have been trying to stop smokers from using their electronic cigarettes in public.
Now Professor Michael Siegel has joined other distinguished scientists by writing articles in newspapers in an exposure of the move to ban electronic cigarettes.
The Professor writes:
“The question the FDA and the anti-smoking groups are asking is: “Are electronic cigarettes safe?” That is not the right question. The right question is: “Are electronic cigarettes much safer than conventional ones?” The FDA and anti-smoking groups are comparing electronic cigarettes to a solution of spring-fresh Maine mountain stream water. What they need to compare electronic cigarettes to is a Marlboro cigarette”
The article is well worth reading – and also needs digging. If enough people digg articles like this our side of the story will get huge exposure.
The link to the digged article is here: http://digg.com/d311gmO
Like this post? Keep up to date with us by signing up for our email updates.
Ready to switch? Visit the Electronic Cigarette Store.
Related posts:
Leave a comment:

There were the tobacco lawsuits, which ended with a settlement and the release of the Legacy Tobacco Documents. What happened to the 'think-tank' noise outlets spreading pro-tobacco misinformation? They're still there, and still strong. And now they're spreading global warming in activism. For more information, visit at: Bolivar cigars.
I have absolutely no idea what you mean.