<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FDA, The MHRA and the Electronic Cigarette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html</link>
	<description>Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; MHRA: No response to RPC Criticism of E-Cig Ban Procedure - Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-16897</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; MHRA: No response to RPC Criticism of E-Cig Ban Procedure - Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-16897</guid>
		<description>[...] MHRA is currently attempting to impose new regulation on e-cigarettes which could lead to a defacto ban. The proposed ban is based on FDA evidence which has been discredited a US court of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MHRA is currently attempting to impose new regulation on e-cigarettes which could lead to a defacto ban. The proposed ban is based on FDA evidence which has been discredited a US court of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>Who, in their right minds, would argue against e-cigarettes?

1) Governments for their tax revenue, second only to vat.
2) Tobacco manufacturers, particularly as there are no benefits whatsoever other than nicotine, which can be used separately and safely. Nicotine, of course, is also used in medicines.
3) Tobacco lobbyists, who work solely for the tobacco manufacturers, have enormous financial clout and do the dirty and under the counter deals with MPs

E-cigarettes would empty 30% of hospital beds, constantly filled with tobacco connected health problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who, in their right minds, would argue against e-cigarettes?</p>
<p>1) Governments for their tax revenue, second only to vat.<br />
2) Tobacco manufacturers, particularly as there are no benefits whatsoever other than nicotine, which can be used separately and safely. Nicotine, of course, is also used in medicines.<br />
3) Tobacco lobbyists, who work solely for the tobacco manufacturers, have enormous financial clout and do the dirty and under the counter deals with MPs</p>
<p>E-cigarettes would empty 30% of hospital beds, constantly filled with tobacco connected health problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Bill, we did send around a proposal to form an association like ECA but nothing happened. However, that was before the current MHRA proposal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, we did send around a proposal to form an association like ECA but nothing happened. However, that was before the current MHRA proposal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>Tony, I suspect this may well end up challenged legally. The way the MHRA have handled the consultation process is a disgrace and is bound to be challenged, but that in itself would only lead to a temporary solution. 

We are committed to working with whoever it takes to getting this approved but the MHRA has not proved easy to work with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, I suspect this may well end up challenged legally. The way the MHRA have handled the consultation process is a disgrace and is bound to be challenged, but that in itself would only lead to a temporary solution. </p>
<p>We are committed to working with whoever it takes to getting this approved but the MHRA has not proved easy to work with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Moran</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Moran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>When are all electronic cigarette companies going to band together as an industry and fight this in court.

The MHRA proposal is nothing more than a thinly disguised attempt to eliminate the competition for one of it`s big paymasters, Johnson &amp; Johnson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are all electronic cigarette companies going to band together as an industry and fight this in court.</p>
<p>The MHRA proposal is nothing more than a thinly disguised attempt to eliminate the competition for one of it`s big paymasters, Johnson &amp; Johnson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-720</guid>
		<description>The MHRA claim that there is seperate legislation over tobacco. However, this is one of the reasons that similar moves by the FDA have been thrown out. There is also the possibility that caffeine would then have to be regulated as a medicine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MHRA claim that there is seperate legislation over tobacco. However, this is one of the reasons that similar moves by the FDA have been thrown out. There is also the possibility that caffeine would then have to be regulated as a medicine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I wonder what would happen if we took the MHRA to court over the electronic cigarette fiasco.
We would file suit claiming that if ecigs are banned,then All cigarettes should also be banned.If howether the judge rules that ecigs are much safer than regular cigarettes,(1400 times less harmful than Marlboro),then maybe the next law suit would be to ban regular tobacco,see how the big Tobacco giants will react to that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what would happen if we took the MHRA to court over the electronic cigarette fiasco.<br />
We would file suit claiming that if ecigs are banned,then All cigarettes should also be banned.If howether the judge rules that ecigs are much safer than regular cigarettes,(1400 times less harmful than Marlboro),then maybe the next law suit would be to ban regular tobacco,see how the big Tobacco giants will react to that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The MHRA, Judge Leon and the FDA</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The MHRA, Judge Leon and the FDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-456</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: MHRA Consultation Document (Also see our previous post: The FDA, The MHRA and the Electronic Cigarette.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: MHRA Consultation Document (Also see our previous post: The FDA, The MHRA and the Electronic Cigarette.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e cigarette</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>e cigarette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the info, this is definately going to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the info, this is definately going to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/fda-mhra-and-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/02/the-fda-the-mhra-and-the-electronic-cigarette.html#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I LOVE my ecig!!! It has changed my life. Get ALL the scientific facts on this website I found... truthaboutecigs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE my ecig!!! It has changed my life. Get ALL the scientific facts on this website I found&#8230; truthaboutecigs.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/18 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 436/440 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 19:39:46 -->
