<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LACORS wrong about nicotine content in electronic cigarette!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/05/lacors-wrong-about-nicotine-content-in-electronic-cigarette.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/05/lacors-wrong-about-nicotine-content-in-electronic-cigarette.html</link>
	<description>Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:25:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/05/lacors-wrong-about-nicotine-content-in-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-24411</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/?p=666#comment-24411</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Nolan. The consensus amongst most scientists we have spoken to (see our interviews here: http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/interviews/electronic-cigarette-interviews.html) is that they are almost certainly a LOT safer than cigarettes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Nolan. The consensus amongst most scientists we have spoken to (see our interviews here: <a href="http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/interviews/electronic-cigarette-interviews.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/interviews/electronic-cigarette-interviews.html</a>) is that they are almost certainly a LOT safer than cigarettes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/05/lacors-wrong-about-nicotine-content-in-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-24410</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/?p=666#comment-24410</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve read it looks like almost all of the harm comes from combustion. The irony seems to be that the carcinogens present in tobacco smoke aren&#039;t what is actually causing cancer.

The primary evidence for this is that Swedish Snus contains between 2-3 times the level of Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines (TSNAs - the carcinogens found in e-cig juice) so should cause 2-3 times the amount of cancer. But they don&#039;t. They are in fact 95-99% safer than smoking tobacco.

E-cigs should be safer than that again, but we will need to wait another 20-30 years before we can know for certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve read it looks like almost all of the harm comes from combustion. The irony seems to be that the carcinogens present in tobacco smoke aren&#8217;t what is actually causing cancer.</p>
<p>The primary evidence for this is that Swedish Snus contains between 2-3 times the level of Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines (TSNAs &#8211; the carcinogens found in e-cig juice) so should cause 2-3 times the amount of cancer. But they don&#8217;t. They are in fact 95-99% safer than smoking tobacco.</p>
<p>E-cigs should be safer than that again, but we will need to wait another 20-30 years before we can know for certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/05/lacors-wrong-about-nicotine-content-in-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/?p=666#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>No, smoking is the number one cause of lung disease, with most of the harm caused by combustion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, smoking is the number one cause of lung disease, with most of the harm caused by combustion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2010/05/lacors-wrong-about-nicotine-content-in-electronic-cigarette.html/comment-page-1#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/?p=666#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>oh well, nicotine is the number cause of lung disease. this substance can really kill your lungs..;~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh well, nicotine is the number cause of lung disease. this substance can really kill your lungs..;~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/12 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 346/350 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 02:49:00 -->
