Professors Destroy ASH’s Junk Science Claims
1 great comment - add yours!
by: James Dunworth

Action on Smoking and Health Claims

ASH.org makes some extreme claims on their website.

1. That 30 minutes of exposure to drifting tobacco smoke can trigger a fatal heart attack.

2. That E Cigarettes pose dangers for both smokers and non-smokers.

3. That third hand smoke can pose serious risks for smokers.

4. That smoker’s breath can be harmful to health.

These claims are no joke.

Use of the Claims

They have been used to:

  • enforce a system of discrimination against smokers, with smokers (not smoking) being barred from hospital waiting rooms
  • as support for separating parents from their children
  • to bar smokers from becoming foster parents
  • to prevent smokers from seeing their children even when they smoke outside
  • as support for arguments for a ban against electronic cigarettes – an alternative to a product which kills over 400,000 Americans and over 100,000 Brits per year

Under the Microscope

With such serious consequences, you would think that there would be equally serious and scientific evidence to back up the data.

Not so, according to the three scientists who examined the claims.

All three are distinguished Professors of Medicine with years of experience in their field.

Click here to see what they have to say about ASH’s claims.

Image Used was from Dick Puddleton: Smoker Apartheid Has Arrived

Like this post? Keep up to date with us by signing up for our email updates.

Leave a comment:

Like This Post?

Join 5000 other readers and get the latest tutorials, special offers videos, cartoons and blog posts from the Ashtray Blog delivered to your inbox.

You’ll also get our FREE ebook, A Guide to Refillable Electronic Cigarettes

If you find that it's not for you, it only takes seconds to unsubscribe.

 We respect your email privacy

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Ashtray Blog: An Electronic Cigarette Blog» Blog Archive » ASH American Electronic Cigarette Ban - April 5, 2010

    […] is probably why many who oppose the cigarette either resort to junk science, or to unproven claims that it could prove attractive to […]

Leave a Reply