Public Health Campaigners Have Higher IQ’s
A recent survey in Israel found that smokers are all thickies.
What the survey failed to point out is that public health campaigners, on the other hand, have a much higher level of intelligence – more than even respected scientists of the past.
So much so, in fact, that they do not need nearly the same amount of evidence to get to the truth as esteemed scientists of the past did.
For example, the British Doctors’ Study followed 35,000 doctors for several years (they actually contacted every doctor in the country) before concluding that smoking lead to lung cancer.
The third hand smoke theory, on the other hand, was proven beyond doubt by a telephone survey of the opinions of 1500 people (http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2009/01/third-hand-smoke-and-chemtrails.html) and by spraying tobacco residue with acid to find carcinongens.
Thank God science has become so much easier and we don’t have to bother with all those long studies any more.
(I believe most of the scientists were smokers at the time, which probably slowed them down enough to poll 35,000 people when obviously a few quick telephone calls would have done the trick.)
We have already been able to come to some new conclusions using their methodology.
For example, in our survey of public health campaigners we asked them if they felt they were right and anti-smokers were wrong. The astonishing survey results revealed that public health campaigners are 100% more right than smoker’s rights activists – further evidence in support of third hand smoke.
Right, I am off now to find some electronic cigarette retailers, and ask them whether they think electronic cigarettes are safe. I am sure that will conclusively prove my case!
Tags: smoker's intelligence, smoker's IQ, smoking survey
Related posts:
Leave a comment:
[...] is conclusive: Tobacco increases work capacity! Smokers are thick! A letter from Brad Rodu The proven positive effects of nicotine and [...]

Do they ever stop making up “facts”?
Incredible.
We’d have to be incredibly stupid to believe the results of their “study”. It’s truly laughable and sad.
C.B.
Eh, studies are nice, but I’m not 100% sure I’m sold on this being the end all be all of truth. Just IMO
If you didn’t use nicotine you’d be able to spell cigarette